where is the cerebral jester?

where is the cerebral jester?
visit him and his friends at the house of dandridge by clicking above

Thursday, April 2, 2009

equality and justice day! 04/28/09

EQUALITY AND JUSTICE DAY IS

APRIL 28, 2009

Register Now!

Isn't your equality worth one day?  Civil Rights Front will be teaming up with Empire State Pride Agenda for Equality & Justice Day.  This is the one day of the year when hundreds of LGBT New Yorkers and our allies go to Albany to demonstrate the power of our community.  E&J Day 2009 will be the most important yet, because now, for the first time ever, we have a pro-LGBT Majority in the State Senate! 

The New York State Assembly has passed our community’s three most important bills: marriage equality, the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act (GENDA) and the Dignity for All Students Act. With an Assembly and a Governor now supporting these issues, we now must make sure that the State Senate takes up and passes these bills so that they can become law in 2009!  Last year there were 1100 participants at E&J Day--now that we have a real chance to pass these bills this year, we’ll need an even bigger turnout!

While Empire State Pride Agenda is holding lobbying sessions with the senators, Civil Rights Front will be conducting several actions outside the capitol to show our strength, numbers, and support.  If you would like to participate in these actions, please note that you are part of Civil Rights Front on your registration form. 

Click here to register online.

Need a scholarship? If you are a student/unemployed/low income and would like to be considered for a scholarship or have any questions regarding the lobbying portion of the day, please email Allison Bess Berwald at ejday@prideagenda.org.

If you have any questions regarding the direct action activities or would like to assist in the planning and execution, please email us at civilrightsfront@gmail.com.



EDUCATION + ORGANIZATION

+ LEGISLATION = CHANGE


The Civil Rights Front is an all inclusive, direct action group working towards marriage equality and full civil rights for the LGBTQ community.  We believe true equality can be achieved by educating people about the challenges we face; organizing our community and allies; and encouraging our government to change discriminatory legislation. We hope to bring LGBTQ organizations, leaders, supporters, and community members together to ensure that a strong and unified voice is heard.  We have a lot of work to do, and we can't do it alone.


chauncey treats

this group of chauncey treats are a smorgasboard of sonic delights...some sexy, some sleazy, some sassy, but all exciting nonetheless...
you know what to do when you get there...just click on the photo...if you need a password look below for previous 'chauncey treat' post...

enjoy!


parenting tips from obnoxio the clown


hahaha...got these awesome parenting tips from a new twitter follower and followee named obnoxio the clown....check out his brilliant blog here



'beetlejuice' @ nowhere! this sunday!


don't forget! my new montly party @ nowhere bar is this sunday! read all about it and rsvp on the facebook event page right here --- 'beetlejuice'





is easter the gayest holiday?





EASTER IS GAY

Fox's 'Wolverine' Leaks Online

madonna wants mercy

Madonna's Lawyer: No Law in Malawi "Can Stop This Adoption"

click pic for full story

Madonna visits a project previously set up by her Raising Malawi Foundation at the Namitete Secondary School on March 30, 2009 just outside Lilongwe, in Malawi.
Michelly Rall/Getty Images


Wednesday, April 1, 2009

uh oh! it's the twitter police!


Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Warning: Twitter cops will arrest you for tweeting about your life. You know who you are people...we don't care that you just ate some food, or that you're tired from a long day so please stop now. This message sponsored by Landline TV, making the world a better place one video at a time.


from the laugh track blog!



is gay the new black or not?

Hitching a Freedom Ride: Gay Ain’t the New Black…
By johathan l. walton
April 1, 2009

Due to the widespread acceptance of black civil rights some members and friends of the LGBTQ community have hitched their conceptual wagons to the black freedom struggle of the 20th century. While gay rights are no trifling matter those eager to make comparisons may want to hold their horses.
George Segal's memorial sculpture for the 1969 Stonewall Rebellion widely held to have launched the gay liberation movement. Photo courtesy wallg.

Last week in the Hawaii state Senate, a bill to recognize civil unions for same-sex couples “died in committee.” In this battle, as in so many others, those who oppose same-sex civil rights have been “loud and hate-filled,” sometimes arguing that gay marriage would lead to the legalization of polygamy or the end of marriage altogether. Self-styled “moderates” counsel against rocking the boat, or speak of waiting until the nation is ready. For gay rights proponents this rhetoric is redolent of the battle for black civil rights, with some even drawing comparisons in the hope of tarring opponents and swinging the debate.

It comes as little surprise that some members and friends of the LGBTQ community have hitched their conceptual wagons to the black freedom struggle of the previous century. Just as African Americans, after 244 years of slavery and an additional century of racial apartheid, fought for equal protections and rights under the law, many LGBTQ persons resist being relegated to second-class citizenship inside the closets of heteronormativity. In the process, some have even suggested that the fight over same-sex marriage is an extension of the civil rights struggle for racial equality.

This creates a problem, to say the least. Rather than fostering an alliance based on a shared conception of exclusion, many African Americans are agitated by the analogy. For many African Americans, the term ‘civil rights’ has a distinctive connotation. And folks rightly argue that same-sex marriage was neither the aim nor necessary conclusion of the civil rights movement. In short, “Gay ain’t the new black.”

Personally, I tend to agree with this latter point, but for different reasons than many. For me the assumption that minority status comes from “who you are rather than what you do” creates a false and flawed division. The argument that being LGBTQ is a choice, unlike racial phenotype, is a poor one. Science has substantiated a biological basis for homosexuality and an estimated 4,000 children are born each year with what doctors refer to as “ambiguous genitalia.” Moreover, I find the thought of millions of men and women choosing self-imposed social exile to be preposterous. The innumerable teenagers that have tragically taken their own lives due to the burden of same-sex attraction undercut the whole “choice” rationale.

On the other hand, I do believe that injustice is contextually specific. And while modes of social injustice may be at times interrelated (i.e. the relationship between racism and classism or the cultural connection between sexism and homophobia), they are still distinguishable and historically contingent. Racism, sexism, classism, homophobia, ageism, etc., are all independent categories. We know that white women can fight against male hierarchy, even as they ignore their own complicity in terms of racial stratification. And middleclass African Americans can challenge racial discrimination in the workplace, while simultaneously reinforcing detrimental conceptions of the black poor. As social ethicist Emilie Townes told a group attending a conference at Claremont School of Theology recently, “Oppression is peculiar. This is why every group needs to have their own story and not co-opt the narrative of others.”

I agree. Quite frankly, there is just too much of a disconnect for me between African Americans’ long fight against slavery and segregation solely determined by the color of one’s skin and the contemporary fight for same-sex marriages. For example, white members of the LBGTQ community have always benefited from racial and class privilege. Gay men owned slaves, lesbian women promoted the system of racial segregation, and transgendered and queer communities continue to be highly stratified and exclusionist on the basis of race and class.

Let’s not forget that it was this nation’s Federal Bureau of Investigations led by a gay white man, J. Edgar Hoover, which sought to squelch the civil rights efforts of openly gay and lesbian activists of color like Bayard Rustin and Earth Thunder (not to mention the several other prominent civil rights leaders of the 60s who continue to live discreet though not necessarily denied gay lives).

Moreover, racial injustice is predicated upon the visual. White LBGTQ persons have always had the option of simply code-switching when beneficial. Sexual orientation is rarely worn on one’s sleeve, face or hair texture. Thus the particularity of white supremacy and legalized racial discrimination in previous epochs resists hackneyed comparisons to the black freedom struggle by those advocating other issues, regardless of how right or just these issues may be.

At the same time, we all must acknowledge that civil rights transcend the African American community. Black folks hardly have a monopoly on constitutional protections. Civil rights are, in theory, afforded to all citizens. The will of a majority can never impinge upon the lives of a minority. Everyone is entitled to equal rights and protection under the law regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, physical handicap or sexual orientation.

This is why petitions for civil rights should not be interpreted as claims for exceptional privilege for any particular group, but rather equal treatment before the law. Julian Bond, national chairman of the NAACP said it best at a recent Human Rights Campaign Gala in Los Angeles. “Gay and lesbian rights are not special rights in any way. It isn’t special to be free from discrimination. It is an ordinary, universal entitlement of citizenship.”

Here is where LBGTQ activists can and are carving out their own distinct narrative of American civil rights activity. They have the opportunity, as persons of color did along the lines of race, to demonstrate the many ways members of the LBGTQ community are being denied the privileges of citizenship that are readily afforded to heterosexual citizens. State constitutional amendments like Proposition 8 outlawing same-sex marriage employ state-power and majority opinion to take away privileges heterosexuals regularly take for granted. The American Constitution is intended to protect the rights of individuals not prohibit them. And by placing heterosexist boundaries around marriage, committed same-sex couples are denied vital material benefits whether they be healthcare, property claims, and a range of other rights the U.S. government provides to legally married couples.

Now some may dispute this assertion with a theological claim that marriage is intended for a man and a woman according to religious principle or even a cosmogonic commitment as to how God created humanity. This is fine but irrelevant. Plenty of citizens who self-define as atheists, agnostics or just plain religiously indifferent get married everyday. It is not their religious commitment, but simply their heterosexual orientation that affords this right. Why deny it to others?

What is more, everyone is free to have his or her own opinion concerning same-sex marriage. One need not like the idea of Jerry marrying David anymore than the thought of Thomas Chung-Kim marrying Keisha Jackson. But in a just, democratic society, those in opposition should not have the authority to deny these human beings the right to participate in an activity that neither damages life nor impinges upon the lives of others.

I would even argue that a religious leader should have the right to decline marrying Lucy and Ethel just as he or she may resist appearing on an episode of Bridezillas or My Big Redneck Wedding. But similar to countless ill-fated, ghetto weddings that take place each year (thank God Bristol Palin and Brother Levi came to their senses!), just because a particular cleric or priest refuses to do it due to faith commitments, does not mean that it can’t be done. There is a difference between clerical prerogative and state-sanctioned discrimination.

In sum, the issue of civil rights and the LBGTQ community cannot be reduced to either race or religion. It’s a matter of rights. Charles E. Cobb, an African American journalist and author who served as a field secretary for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) in Mississippi between 1962-67 seems to have the right perspective. While recently promoting his new book On the Road to Freedom: A Guided Tour of the Civil Rights Trail he offered his thoughtful opinion. “Gay marriage should be treated as any other civil rights,” he said. “Not all civil rights are racial.”

And I would add that just because they are not racial, doesn’t mean they are not right.


ok children....what do you think?




dolphins and butterflies

i promised you dolphins and butterfies...




Tori Amos-"Sleeps With Butterflies" Music Video


Wanda Sykes and the Racist Dolphin


Tokyo Mew Mew - Butterfly


How to make a balloon dolphin hat

more cheney nonsense

Hersh: Cheney ‘Left A Stay Behind’ In Obama’s Government, Can ‘Still Control Policy Up To A Point’

cheney.jpgIn an interview on NPR’s Fresh Air yesterday, host Terry Gross asked investigative journalist Seymour Hersh if, as he continues to investigate the Bush administration, “more people” were “coming forward” to talk to him now that “the president and vice president are no longer in power.” Hersh replied that though “a lot of people that had told me in the last year of Bush, ‘call me next, next February,’ not many people had talked to him. He implied that they were still scared of Cheney.

“Are you saying that you think Vice President Cheney is still having a chilling effect on people who might otherwise be coming forward,” asked Gross. “I’ll make it worse,” answered Hersh, adding that he believes Cheney “put people back” in government to “stay behind” in order to “tell him what’s going on” and perhaps even “do sabotage”:

HERSH: I’ll make it worse. I think he’s put people left. He’s put people back. They call it a stay behind. It’s sort of an intelligence term of art. When you leave a country and, you know, you’ve driven out the, you know, you’ve lost the war. You leave people behind. It’s a stay behind that you can continue to contacts with, to do sabotage, whatever you want to do. Cheney’s left a stay behind. He’s got people in a lot of agencies that still tell him what’s going on. Particularly in defense, obviously. Also in the NSA, there’s still people that talk to him. He still knows what’s going on. Can he still control policy up to a point? Probably up to a point, a minor point. But he’s still there. He’s still a presence.

Listen here:

The idea that Cheney would seed the government with trusted contacts is not surprising. As Hersh noted in his talk with Gross, Cheney has “been around forever” and “understands bureaucracy much better” than almost anyone in government. In 2006, Robert Dreyfuss reported for The American Prospect that when Cheney helped staff the Bush administration in 2001, he put together a “corps of hard-line acolytes” that served “as his eyes and ears” in the federal bureaucracy. Former officials called them “Dick Cheney’s spies.”

Additionally, before leaving office, the Bush administration aggressively placed political appointees into permanent civil service positions as part of a process known as “burrowing.” Some of the burrowed former political appointees have close ties to Cheney, such as Jeffrey T. Salmon, who was a speechwriter for Cheney when he served as defense secretary. In July, he was named deputy director for resource management in the Energy Department’s Office of Science

Transcript:

GROSS: You investigated the Bush administration throughout the Bush administration. Always looking for ways that they may, might have been going beyond executive authority in taking on new powers. And now that the Bush administration is over, you’re still investigating what they did and where they might have violated the law. Is investigating that any different for you as a journalist post-Bush administration than it was during the Bush administration? Are more people coming forward now, now that the president and vice president are no longer in power?

HERSH: You know, that’s a great question because I did think, I had a lot of people that had told me in the last year of Bush, “call me next, next February.” And, so far, even people who are out are still cherry because, you know, not so much Bush, but Cheney really is…he’s really smart. In the article this week, in the New Yorker, that’s coming out this week, I mention that at one point last fall, Mr. Miliband, the young foreign secretary of Britain, unilaterally, without telling the White House made a trip to Syria to see the president, Assad, and his intelligence chief, his MI6 chief went before him. And Bush-Cheney didn’t know about it until actually was, they were actually there. And Cheney at a meeting — and I do have, I can tell you I do have access and have had and I’ve been careful of how I use it, to a lot of stuff from meetings in the White House — and at a meeting he railed on about perfidious Albion, you know, the old Shakespeare term for England and that was used during the Revolutionary war as a pejorative term for England. Perfidious Albion he said. He is, Cheney is really underestimated. It’s easy to make a caricature of him. He’s very very bright. And he’s also in person, a much more open-minded in the sense, I’m talking about not politically. You could go and the most despaired people in the world go and have social evenings with him and his wife and talking about current, as long as you don’t get into politics, movies and stuff like that. It’s, he’s easy to make a caricature, but he’s much more formidable than people think. Got a rap clap memory. Understands bureaucracy much better, he’s been around forever, has had every job.

GROSS: Are you saying that you think Vice President Cheney is still having a chilling effect on people who might otherwise be coming forward and revealing things to you about what happened in the Bush administration?

HERSH: I’ll make it worse. I think he’s put people left. He’s put people back. They call it a stay behind. It’s sort of an intelligence term of art. When you leave a country and, you know, you’ve driven out the, you know, you’ve lost the war. You leave people behind. It’s a stay behind that you can continue to contacts with, to do sabotage, whatever you want to do. Cheney’s left a stay behind. He’s got people in a lot of agencies that still tell him what’s going on. Particularly in defense, obviously. Also in the NSA, there’s still people that talk to him. He still knows what’s going on. Can he still control policy up to a point? Probably up to a point, a minor point. But he’s still there. He’s still a presence. And again, because of the problems this administration’s having filling jobs, a lot of people who served in the Bush Cheney government, particularly even in the White House people on most sophisticated staffs are still there. You simply can’t get rid of everybody, you may not even want to. Some are professional people. But Cheney is, I would never call it admiration, but, you know, formidable, yeah, this guy. This guy is the real McCoy.



Republicans Disinvite Palin From Major Fundraiser, Trash Her In Private

what has huffington post downgraded and hired former enquirer employees to write their stories?

Republicans Disinvite Palin From Major Fundraiser, Trash Her In Private

Posted using ShareThis

boing boing


check this out...it's amazing!!!

Apture

DJ Chauncey D on Facebook